NCAA | Athlete Compensation | Name, Image and Likeness

Following reports of the NCAA starting to take steps to limit NIL collectives, agents and boosters are saying, ‘bring it.’

Read more HERE: https://t.co/X9URybricT pic.twitter.com/1NWkb9yRZl

— On3 NIL (@On3NIL) May 9, 2022

 

It’s official. The NCAA is cracking down on its NIL and recruiting rules... 👀

The NCAA Board of Directors sent out new guidance Monday to its Division I membership clarifying the current rules and prohibiting boosters from recruiting.

Read more HERE: https://t.co/rYoSsH9lU1 pic.twitter.com/RA6bcVLM0Z

— On3 NIL (@On3NIL) May 9, 2022

 

The NCAA just issued guidance in an attempt to clarify its NIL rules.

The focus now turns to... everything else.@NicoleAuerbach previews the NCAA’s summer of rule changes ⤵️https://t.co/KJc1n31Mr7

— The Athletic (@TheAthletic) May 11, 2022

 

This is how NIL started. California bill was copied by other states. Now states copying this initiative which seems to go directly against the @NCAA edict of Monday. https://t.co/1ubg3Xm6AN

— Dennis Dodd (@dennisdoddcbs) May 13, 2022

 

One of the practical challenges for the NCAA in lobbying Congress for an NIL statute and an antitrust exemption is that it faces demands for significant reforms from members of both parties. That makes the path for a NIL statute unlikely. The demands go far beyond NIL. https://t.co/vgXNvhfzF9

— Michael McCann (@McCannSportsLaw) May 12, 2022

 

By trying to limit how much schools can help college athletes cashing in on their fame, the NCAA inadvertently opened the door for boosters to get a foothold in a burgeoning market. Now what?

by @ralphdrussoap
https://t.co/0e1F0jUkEc

— AP Top 25 (@AP_Top25) May 15, 2022

 

What are they afraid of?

This isn’t the mafia. There is no Omerta.

Pat Narduzzi isn’t going to wake up one morning with a panther head in his bed because he pointed a finger at USC boosters. https://t.co/a9Y3B2CwYy

— Tony Gerdeman (@TonyGerdeman) May 15, 2022